"Mental Incompetency" Part II

I have been court ordered to get a mental evaluation because
it "appears" that I have mental problems

ACCORDING TO THE INCIDENT IN TACOMA, WA
AT THE BRIDGEPORT MASJID.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order to get my children back I have to undergo a
MENTAL EVALUATION .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

SURE NO PROBLEM, RIGHT? WRONG.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I completed the Evaluation long ago by non other than myself,
as a referrel through my own non profit Healthcare Organization

However,

when the SWer found out they tried to take away my rights to
represent myself in the courts claiming a chance of incompetency
due to the "HISTORY" fabricated in Tacoma (refer to the police
reports in the 1st parts of this blog)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THis is to prevent my representing my family's best interest.

They objected to the submittal of my evaluation and REQUEST
TO HAVE MY KIDS BACK IMMEDIATELY AND NOW
FORCED ME TO HAVE AN EVALUATION DONE BY SOMEONE
THEY USUALLY ARE FAMILIAR WITH AND ESTABLISHED WITH.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Update on THEIR preferred provider.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I made it an emergency to get an evaluation completed with a
provider from their "favorites list"

and paying out of pocket when signing the financial agreement
was a word incorporated as "TREATMENT".

so now it is in another file that I am officially a PATIENT
RECEIVING TREATMENT WHEN I ONLY WENT IN
FOR AN EVAL TO ABIDE BY THE LAWS INFLICTED
AS A RESULT OF ROBLE ABDINOOR'S INTENT TO
DAMAGE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Being that I have just begun my career as a healthcare provider,
this "treatment agreement" is now and has to remain on my
records for the next 7 years incorporating any heresay gossip or
backbiting by opposing party's in this CUSTODY CASE into the
records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

When requesting that a new contract be drawn up as

CONSULTATION & not "TREATMENT" BECAUSE SOMETHING
THAT IS NOT BROKEN SHOULD NEVER TAKE THE
CREDIT OF BEING FIXED,

I was told that I'm requesting that a law be broken by a request
to truthfully make the agreement a CONSULTATION FOR
EVALUATION & not "TREATMENT"

AND STILL HAVE TO PAY FOR THIS